From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JBLg5-0004bX-Kq for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 02:55:58 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id m062t2Ca028618; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 02:55:02 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m062r4Mp026135 for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 02:53:05 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.150] (adsl-65-67-72-193.dsl.fyvlar.swbell.net [65.67.72.193]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64CD2657B4 for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 02:53:04 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <47804281.3010000@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:52:49 -0600 From: Martin Jackson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January References: <20080101103002.083C4652C4@smtp.gentoo.org> <54551.192.168.2.159.1199365359.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <477D75CA.1030003@gentoo.org> <20080104000155.23e056b4@snowcone> <20080104004653.039f488e@snowcone> <20080104012750.63f4f23a@snowcone> <63044.68.54.223.178.1199445791.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <20080104210213.50a99e6b@snowcone> <61164.68.54.223.178.1199485599.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <20080104223754.3fb48b85@snowcone> <1199506818.7609.30.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <20080105043233.0935d2f8@snowcone> <20080105124751.0bef4908@gentoo.org> <20080106003246.6e4b6425@snowcone> <20080106013630.7e0a504b@snowcone> <47803A61.7000600@gentoo.org> <20080106022402.01174707@snowcone> <47803DA9.10000@gentoo.org> <20080106023852.25b42e4b@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <20080106023852.25b42e4b@snowcone> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 68123555-a07e-415a-8cfc-06459a30bb63 X-Archives-Hash: 22ff6f61b580497cb8e587eca0494e66 > When arch people get dozens to hundreds of bug emails per day, no, it's > not. A simple "this is now a security issue, see bug blah" makes it an > awful lot easier for arch people to prioritise -- emails that merely > show blockers added or removed tend to get ignored because a) they're > almost always meaningless changes from the arch team's perspective, and > b) the bug email doesn't convey any useful information on its own > anyway. > That's making the assumption that anyone looked at it, of course. Please note comment #9 on http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198346. It was still ~8 days from then that the setuptools keyword was added. So, we have examples of impact due to delay in keywords/etc. Shall we proceed with the discussion of what to do about it? Thanks, Marty -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list