From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JBLLz-0003e9-CJ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 02:35:11 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id m062YLkk011620; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 02:34:21 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m062WPRv009052 for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 02:32:25 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.150] (adsl-65-67-72-193.dsl.fyvlar.swbell.net [65.67.72.193]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B1365777 for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 02:32:24 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <47803DA9.10000@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:32:09 -0600 From: Martin Jackson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January References: <20080101103002.083C4652C4@smtp.gentoo.org> <54551.192.168.2.159.1199365359.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <477D75CA.1030003@gentoo.org> <20080104000155.23e056b4@snowcone> <20080104004653.039f488e@snowcone> <20080104012750.63f4f23a@snowcone> <63044.68.54.223.178.1199445791.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <20080104210213.50a99e6b@snowcone> <61164.68.54.223.178.1199485599.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <20080104223754.3fb48b85@snowcone> <1199506818.7609.30.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <20080105043233.0935d2f8@snowcone> <20080105124751.0bef4908@gentoo.org> <20080106003246.6e4b6425@snowcone> <20080106013630.7e0a504b@snowcone> <47803A61.7000600@gentoo.org> <20080106022402.01174707@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <20080106022402.01174707@snowcone> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: b460ca4b-a753-468e-90e2-627ebe99e96b X-Archives-Hash: 7ccfdd7f511c3e9a686de5e1d7232e68 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:18:09 -0600 > Martin Jackson wrote: >> See http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=191550 - it took > 2 >> months for mips to keyword it. >> >> Security bugs are normally supposed to have enhanced priority for >> keywording, etc. > > Perhaps you should have explicitly stated in the bug that it was for > security reasons and thus a priority. Make things easy for the arch > teams -- if you have useful information like that, provide it in an > easy to see place. Looking at that bug, I don't see anything indicating > that there's any reason it should have been considered over more widely > used packages. > Because setuptools is not widely used? The sec bug was (and remains) linked as a blocker. Is that not explicit or easy enough? Thanks, Marty -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list