* [gentoo-dev] RFC: length of the DESCRIPTION variable
@ 2008-01-06 0:21 Petteri Räty
2008-01-06 0:22 ` Petteri Räty
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Petteri Räty @ 2008-01-06 0:21 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 450 bytes --]
Current devmanual suggest to not use line lengths over 80 characters.
http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/file-format/index.html
I wrote a repoman check that checks that the value doesn't go over 80.
This is useful for tools like eix that show the DESCRIPTION. The thing
is that lots of ebuilds will fail this currently. Do you think we should
use a higher limit like 100? qualudis seems to use 120 currently.
Regards,
Petteri
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 252 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: length of the DESCRIPTION variable
2008-01-06 0:21 [gentoo-dev] RFC: length of the DESCRIPTION variable Petteri Räty
@ 2008-01-06 0:22 ` Petteri Räty
2008-01-09 20:25 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Petteri Räty @ 2008-01-06 0:22 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 741 bytes --]
Petteri Räty kirjoitti:
> Current devmanual suggest to not use line lengths over 80 characters.
> http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/file-format/index.html
>
> I wrote a repoman check that checks that the value doesn't go over 80.
> This is useful for tools like eix that show the DESCRIPTION. The thing
> is that lots of ebuilds will fail this currently. Do you think we should
> use a higher limit like 100? qualudis seems to use 120 currently.
>
> Regards,
> Petteri
>
Seems devmanual is currently putting the limit to 80 too.
http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/variables/index.html
DESCRIPTION A short (less than 80 characters) description of the
package's purpose.
Regards,
Petteri
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 252 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: length of the DESCRIPTION variable
2008-01-06 0:22 ` Petteri Räty
@ 2008-01-09 20:25 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2008-01-09 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev; +Cc: Petteri Räty
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1018 bytes --]
On Saturday 05 January 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Petteri Räty kirjoitti:
> > Current devmanual suggest to not use line lengths over 80 characters.
> > http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/file-format/index.html
> >
> > I wrote a repoman check that checks that the value doesn't go over 80.
> > This is useful for tools like eix that show the DESCRIPTION. The thing
> > is that lots of ebuilds will fail this currently. Do you think we should
> > use a higher limit like 100? qualudis seems to use 120 currently.
>
> Seems devmanual is currently putting the limit to 80 too.
>
> http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/variables/index.html
>
> DESCRIPTION A short (less than 80 characters) description of the
> package's purpose.
it's always been highly recommended that the DESCRIPTION be a short string,
but there has never been a hard limit. if you want to have repoman warn upon
large strings (over 100 chars), that's fine, but there should be no hard
limit anywhere.
-mike
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 835 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-01-09 20:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-01-06 0:21 [gentoo-dev] RFC: length of the DESCRIPTION variable Petteri Räty
2008-01-06 0:22 ` Petteri Räty
2008-01-09 20:25 ` Mike Frysinger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox