From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hp1oo-0001iX-5Z for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 18 May 2007 12:44:26 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4IChSmu002638; Fri, 18 May 2007 12:43:28 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4ICfWnl000399 for ; Fri, 18 May 2007 12:41:33 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD4A64A73 for ; Fri, 18 May 2007 12:41:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -0.966 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.966 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.966] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1aviW9EzOlQK for ; Fri, 18 May 2007 12:41:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from aei-tech.com (static-69-95-200-80.ind.choiceone.net [69.95.200.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC3964BBF for ; Fri, 18 May 2007 12:41:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1639 invoked from network); 18 May 2007 08:41:10 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO www.aei-tech.com) (192.168.1.1) by 192.168.1.1 with SMTP; Fri, 18 May 2007 08:41:10 -0400 Received: from 192.168.2.155 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ctennis) by www.aei-tech.com with HTTP; Fri, 18 May 2007 08:41:10 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <47748.192.168.2.155.1179492070.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 08:41:10 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [gentoo-dev] distcc and precompiled headers From: "Caleb Tennis" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Archives-Salt: cefc7351-507a-4b72-a0e3-ac01f682f62d X-Archives-Hash: 61c5f328b009672a3f98397234e42e65 Based on some recent findings, it looks like the two above mentioned features don't work together. pch don't get distributed to distcc nodes, so they're basically mutually exclusive. However, distcc is a FEATURE and pch are a USE flag. Should we just put a check in each ebuild that uses the pch use flag, make an eclass, or build something into the package manager(s) ? Thoughts? Caleb -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list