From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-39937-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1NpFmq-0006r7-Q2
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:52:57 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C69DE0AC2;
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:52:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-fx0-f213.google.com (mail-fx0-f213.google.com [209.85.220.213])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A14E086F
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:52:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so2267061fxm.29
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:52:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=wpd2cWexg/rWbg0QFo9FRSsYUwr3ioFjx6YrG6Bl80M=;
b=pzOleinoDSddmIetLsvGSSU8RPcgt3+7c+lDz3tfOUBl1n0UwI6N9v5iS18tG0XWpW
c+EUL3/i6GlfH/Zcs4z4tjBxXa+ecjsHtIsyOERd+8RlHCHZloN8HqauWAbjOi3pWOWJ
9VIQc4QKdUg1fC/EU9oYdtIwrumQ1HNt0BFuk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
b=OKDWhm118WF6KrXO5sYr4bHGf1USKwA5WC8+EpRQnV8dqsUMpg54osgnK9Ud2+PaEl
uwvr968sDKyeEwHN40qfrER0M5TTQgmQ9uiQ1E61O1h6PK7Gt7Z4GK79UGBvA+hgXjkP
P5I+KmD00JOLfi1MPnd812bFxMsChEK8npYRE=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: unhollow@gmail.com
Received: by 10.223.143.82 with SMTP id t18mr1000676fau.52.1268203948050; Tue,
09 Mar 2010 22:52:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4B97125C.6050601@gentoo.org>
References: <4B97125C.6050601@gentoo.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:52:28 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 48636bd7130f85ae
Message-ID: <477338b91003092252u4ed393dj483d4f2f7d9a526c@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] webapp-config needs a new maintainer
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Benedikt_B=C3=B6hm?= <hollow@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: c1bf7cca-ffac-4ce7-9be6-c49c44f08e2b
X-Archives-Hash: 2645cd77c4d1159f3f21453245e2b9c6
Hi!
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 4:30 AM, Sebastian Pipping <sping@gentoo.org> wrote:
> There are quite a few bugs open for it plus the latest version (1.50.18)
> is not even in Gentoo but on SourceForge only.
The release on sourceforge is not compatible with the current
implementation in Gentoo AFAIK.
> So your first task would be a proper bump and a maybe few bug fixes after:
webapp-config is in a horrible shape and also has several design
flaws. i wouldn't touch it. that's why i already added an idea to the
GSoC list for a complete w-c rewrite. i talked to gunnar in 2008 or
2009 at chemnitz linux days, and we agreed that w-c needs a rewrite.
but none of us had/has time to do it. hopefully gsoc can change this
situation.
Greetings,
Bene