From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J61LM-0000BB-TZ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 10:12:33 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lBMABKFd001687; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 10:11:20 GMT Received: from xylophone.i-cable.com (xylophone.i-cable.com [203.83.115.99]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lBMA70I6027357 for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 10:07:01 GMT Received: (qmail 15320 invoked by uid 508); 22 Dec 2007 10:06:59 -0000 Received: from 203.83.114.122 by xylophone (envelope-from , uid 505) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.90.3/4349. Clear:RC:1(203.83.114.122):. Processed in 0.204451 secs); 22 Dec 2007 10:06:58 -0000 Received: from ip114122.hkicable.com (HELO xenon.i-cable.com) (203.83.114.122) by 0 with SMTP; 22 Dec 2007 10:06:58 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.100] (cm222-167-208-85.hkcable.com.hk [222.167.208.85]) by xenon.i-cable.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id lBMA6vku010491 for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 18:06:58 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <476CE24C.3060201@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 18:09:16 +0800 From: Zhang Le User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071123) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) References: <200712172320.01988.peper@gentoo.org> <20071220003801.GL24034@supernova> <4769D3F2.1030204@gentoo.org> <20071220040753.31cf0c2e@blueyonder.co.uk> <476A45CD.2050107@gmail.com> <20071220104209.684aedf5@blueyonder.co.uk> <476A4CD3.1060800@gmail.com> <20071220140241.20551otmf7ffjdwk@www2.mailstation.de> <476A94FC.30105@gmail.com> <476ADFA5.1060404@gentoo.org> <20071221005449.11c10ea3@blueyonder.co.uk> <476B2228.90408@gentoo.org> <20071221022638.4380639d@blueyonder.co.uk> <476B342F.8030900@gentoo.org> <20071221033626.44ff701a@blueyonder.co.uk> <476B3B0D.4000902@gentoo.org> <20071221040650.0ef0dae2@blueyonder.co.uk> <476B40B3.8030607@gentoo.org> <20071221043210.2ee10fb4@blueyonder.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20071221043210.2ee10fb4@blueyonder.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=1E4E2973 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 41fa5edc-0e59-4866-b698-216df6ff1ba6 X-Archives-Hash: 350a6a357aaf90657fdb94cd6740054e Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 12:27:31 +0800 > Zhang Le wrote: >> But I am not sick of EAPI's. You see? I am sick of so *many* EAPI's. > > What? All two of them that you need to know about, where the second > one is the first one with three new features? Sorry, I made you confused. I was not talking about now, I am talking about the consequences of this glep. At least we already have a EAPI 2 tracker in our bugzilla. I am afraid we lose the control of EAPI development. or maybe I just over reacted, but you get my point. We need to make a formal development model and development cycle of EAPI. We need to make sure all developers and as many users as possible to know it. I have just created a page of EAPI on wikipedia, let's improve it together. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EAPI -- Zhang Le, Robert GPG key ID: 1E4E2973 Fingerprint: 0260 C902 B8F8 6506 6586 2B90 BC51 C808 1E4E 2973 -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list