From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J5Hk4-0002ep-U7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 09:31:01 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lBK9TjET014776; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 09:29:45 GMT Received: from smtp03.tky.fi (smtp03.tky.fi [82.130.63.73]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lBK9RkmK012414 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 09:27:46 GMT Received: from [82.130.46.236] ([82.130.46.236]) by smtp03.tky.fi (SMSSMTP 4.1.9.35) with SMTP id M2007122011274601659 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:27:46 +0200 Message-ID: <476A350E.90802@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:25:34 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071124) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) References: <200712172320.01988.peper@gentoo.org> <20071220003801.GL24034@supernova> <20071220082938.4bf4cf3b@blueyonder.co.uk> <20071220091946.GA13390@supernova> In-Reply-To: <20071220091946.GA13390@supernova> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: url=http://users.tkk.fi/~praty/public.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig65F46ECA44D37605DB789533" X-Archives-Salt: e3ee4be7-aac0-448b-9344-2f1254056962 X-Archives-Hash: bd88d408ed6454ee3683109e746f7c33 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig65F46ECA44D37605DB789533 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Donnie Berkholz kirjoitti: > On 08:29 Thu 20 Dec , Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:38:01 -0800 >> Donnie Berkholz wrote: >>> Here's some other ideas for how to express EAPI. What if we: >>> >>> Used EAPI-named subdirectories instead of tagging it into the >>> filename? >> Performance hit, and otherwise equivalent to using suffixes. >=20 > Not quite so ugly-looking to my eyes. >=20 >>> Used (and required) filesystem extended attributes? >> Unportable, unsyncable and unmaintainable. >=20 > Unportable to filesystems that don't support extended attributes isn't = > very interesting to me, unless they're common. Out of curiosity, do you= =20 > know which ones that would be? Looking at my kernel config, ext3 and=20 > reiser explicitly support xattrs, and I see jfs and xfs have acls and=20 > security labels, which might be usable. Unsyncable would be a problem, = > so it's a good thing rsync has USE=3Dxattr -- do the difficulties come = in=20 > on the CVS side? Why do you say unmaintainable? >=20 Many users might have extended attributes support turned off in the kerne= l. Regards, Petteri --------------enig65F46ECA44D37605DB789533 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHajURcxLzpIGCsLQRAhnvAKCAvmR7CnIbQ/MC3SneOTQgf8We7ACbB0aF 6ghDtNqXzzWYvAuILh/Z1eQ= =RFKh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig65F46ECA44D37605DB789533-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list