From: "Sébastien Fabbro" <bicatali@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-cluster/openmpi: ChangeLog openmpi-1.1.1.ebuild openmpi-1.2.4.ebuild
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:16:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4762AC6F.9020206@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1197641559.16649.10.camel@vega.lnet>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 14/12/07 14:12, Matthias Langer wrote:
> F77="ifort" FC="ifort" FFLAGS="-O3 -xO" emerge -av openmpi
This how it should be. To make it automatically reproducible, specify
environment variables in the configuration files.
> Maybe someone can explain to me what positive side effects the removal
> of the ifc USE flag has - and why this flag is generally discouraged.
Positive side effect: avoid cluttering the tree. Why icc/ifc are
discouraged: you can always try to compile every C/C++ package with
CC=icc and fortran packages with F77=ifort or FC=ifort. Packages which
do specify more options with e.g. --enable-icc and friends can be easily
worked out with the toolchain-funcs and fortran eclass, and most of the
time they do nothing more than specify the environment variables.
If we allow icc/ifc flags, at some point, we could allow a whole bunch
of other compiler flags such as "sunstudio". New keywords for compilers
could be a better idea, but I doubt we have the human resources to test
them.
> The reason it disappeared is that it makes gfortran horribly slow when
> compiling against mpi. This is not the case with ifc, and therefore the
> old ebuild in bugzilla emitted a bold warning when emerging with
> USE="-ifc f90-typesafe" but kept quiet if USE="ifc f90-typesave". Thus
> it *did make sense* to control it with a USE flag, at least with the
> "ifc" USE flag being around also.
If the f90-typesafe options always improve compilation time with
gfortran only, why not using something like this (modified from the
openmpi bump bug):
if use fortran; then
case ${FORTRANC} in
g77) myconf="${myconf} --disable-mpi-f90" ;;
gfortran) myconf="${myconf} --with-mpi-f90-size=medium"
myconf="${myconf} --with-f90-max-array-dim=4" ;;
if*) myconf="${myconf} blah" ;;
*) die "unsupported fortran compiler: ${FORTRANC}"
esac
else
myconf="${myconf} --disable-mpi-f90 --disable-mpi-f77"
fi
Let the ebuild make reasonable choices instead of making a user trying
to find out about undocumented use flags.
- --
Sébastien
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHYqxv1ycZbhPLE2ARAlRRAJ9BySHhbxAzLOgJdG4I2L3RpCPPNwCgi8aF
v3OgmxW4UZj1Gqf7Pg2vBWE=
=vYF+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-14 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <E1J2dWi-0006Ue-Fk@stork.gentoo.org>
2007-12-13 9:18 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-cluster/openmpi: ChangeLog openmpi-1.1.1.ebuild openmpi-1.2.4.ebuild Donnie Berkholz
2007-12-14 10:24 ` Matthias Langer
2007-12-14 12:13 ` Sébastien Fabbro
2007-12-14 14:12 ` Matthias Langer
2007-12-14 16:16 ` Sébastien Fabbro [this message]
2007-12-14 17:12 ` Matthias Langer
2007-12-14 19:52 ` Sébastien Fabbro
2007-12-15 1:51 ` Duncan
2007-12-14 14:53 ` [gentoo-dev] " Justin Bronder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4762AC6F.9020206@gentoo.org \
--to=bicatali@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox