From: "Jan Kundrát" <jkt@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] scm package version suffix
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 19:45:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <475C37C7.8010201@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200712091701.50364.peper@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1010 bytes --]
> Specification
> =============
>
> ``scm`` is a special suffix. It can be used on its own, but also in any other
> valid version spec, just before the place where revision would go. And just like
> revision it can be used only once in a version spec, e.g.:
>
> * ``cat/pkg-1.0_alpha0-scm``
> * ``cat/pkg-1.0_alpha-scm``
> * ``cat/pkg-1.0-scm-r3``
> * ``cat/pkg-1-scm``
> * ``cat/pkg-1-scm-r2``
> * ``cat/pkg-scm``
>
> These package atoms are sorted in ascending order (see `Version Comparison`_).
What is the point of using version information along the scm suffix?
From the logical POV, scm is a special decorator saying "this is a
special tarball that can change in time and we don't know its version
when parsing ebuild, we'd have to ask the repository". Surely I can
think of uses for *revision* specification (as in "revision of the
ebuild"), but why to support full version for scm packages?
Cheers,
-jkt
--
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 252 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-09 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-09 16:01 [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] scm package version suffix Piotr Jaroszyński
2007-12-09 16:18 ` Josh Sled
2007-12-09 17:22 ` Piotr Jaroszyński
2007-12-09 17:52 ` Petteri Räty
2007-12-09 18:00 ` Piotr Jaroszyński
2007-12-09 18:45 ` Jan Kundrát [this message]
2007-12-09 18:57 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2007-12-10 4:31 ` Donnie Berkholz
2007-12-10 7:18 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2007-12-10 7:44 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2007-12-10 8:24 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2007-12-10 8:36 ` Robin H. Johnson
2007-12-10 8:44 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2007-12-11 1:12 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
2007-12-10 12:59 ` [gentoo-dev] " Robert Buchholz
2007-12-10 14:24 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2007-12-10 15:14 ` Robert Buchholz
2007-12-10 19:44 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2007-12-10 19:49 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2007-12-11 0:27 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steve Long
2007-12-11 10:59 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2007-12-11 11:03 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2007-12-11 8:21 ` Duncan
2007-12-11 11:06 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2007-12-11 11:17 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2007-12-11 12:10 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2007-12-10 8:26 ` [gentoo-dev] " Robin H. Johnson
2007-12-10 8:34 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2007-12-10 9:21 ` [gentoo-dev] Handling branch strings Donnie Berkholz
2007-12-10 9:34 ` Santiago M. Mola
2007-12-10 19:42 ` Donnie Berkholz
2007-12-11 1:35 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
2007-12-11 8:11 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ciaran McCreesh
2007-12-11 11:46 ` Santiago M. Mola
2007-12-11 17:56 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer
2007-12-09 19:38 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [GLEP] scm package version suffix Ryan Hill
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=475C37C7.8010201@gentoo.org \
--to=jkt@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox