From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IxLEk-0001PF-IV for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:37:51 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lASBb1qN002498; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:37:01 GMT Received: from pollux.sshunet.nl (pollux.sshunet.nl [145.97.192.42]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lASBZAYO032656 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:35:10 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pollux.sshunet.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9995580018 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:35:09 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at pollux.warande.net Received: from pollux.sshunet.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pollux.sshunet.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zb20zWkv7MHj for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:34:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from [145.97.222.65] (65pc222.sshunet.nl [145.97.222.65]) by pollux.sshunet.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:34:20 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <474D53CA.7060101@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:40:58 +0100 From: "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Features and documentation References: <20071127192144.GP4368@supernova> In-Reply-To: <20071127192144.GP4368@supernova> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 742b37fe-5c21-4f23-99e2-06f29a03b6fb X-Archives-Hash: fe6e32a62611d91f22fc2ea2d91fab4b -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > How the recent changes happened to allow USE flag descriptions in > metadata.xml (which I'm not taking any position on now) gave me an idea. > The Linux kernel requires that any needed documentation accompany all > changes requiring said documentation -- part of the source-code patch > must apply to the Documentation/ directory. Should we require that > before you commit any changes, you (or someone) write the documentation > for them and commit it or submit a patch at the same time? We're not talking about ebuilds here, are we? So what ARE we talking about? Marijn - -- Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML , #gentoo-{lisp,ml} on FreeNode -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHTVPKp/VmCx0OL2wRAoMqAJ4zkrWMSmthzxNNjc+/syiz4EMq2wCcCnSE CA8fiI/lq716rIV5+i9r4lI= =ypdc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list