Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Features and documentation

["Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <hkBst@gentoo.org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> How the recent changes happened to allow USE flag descriptions in 
> metadata.xml (which I'm not taking any position on now) gave me an idea. 
> The Linux kernel requires that any needed documentation accompany all 
> changes requiring said documentation -- part of the source-code patch 
> must apply to the Documentation/ directory. Should we require that 
> before you commit any changes, you (or someone) write the documentation 
> for them and commit it or submit a patch at the same time?

We're not talking about ebuilds here, are we? So what ARE we talking about?

Marijn

- --
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML
<http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-{lisp,ml} on FreeNode
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHTVPKp/VmCx0OL2wRAoMqAJ4zkrWMSmthzxNNjc+/syiz4EMq2wCcCnSE
CA8fiI/lq716rIV5+i9r4lI=
=ypdc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list