From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IwaaS-0008Rb-Pi for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 09:49:09 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lAQ9mHJM023177; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 09:48:17 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lAQ9kHip020515; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 09:46:18 GMT Received: from [192.168.209.1] (e176102215.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.176.102.215]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BAAD65345; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 09:46:16 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <474A95E4.6000906@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 10:46:12 +0100 From: Markus Ullmann User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070805) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] maintainer-wanted bugcount X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE8882CD74D12A86E38E8D07C" X-Archives-Salt: 7d40c36c-caa2-4129-afbd-03841eee8d04 X-Archives-Hash: 6013459496c7ce2448ce26c15c79c401 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE8882CD74D12A86E38E8D07C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi fellows, when taking a look at the open bug count for bugs assigned to maintainer-wanted (2450 at the time of writing), it seems pretty obvious that we really can't handle all of them, at least not without growing at least two dozen devs to maintain it properly. As I highly doubt this will happen within a week, we have to make a decision how to proceed with this stuff. So what options do we have? These come to mind: a) WONTFIX them within 4 or 8 weeks without picking them up b) reassign them to herds (some herds are on CC) and have them respond withing 4-8 weeks and give a yey or boo. c) let interested users move it to sunrise (some of them are there) so that the ebuilds are at least at our QA level we maintain for gentoo-x86 and are there to be picked up by devs if they're interested If you have more options or comments, I'd like to hear about them, as we definitely have to do something there. F'up is set to gentoo-project as this is more a political thing. Greetz -Jokey --------------enigE8882CD74D12A86E38E8D07C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHSpXkz974XjDVpbkRAqWgAJoDOxJBvdK/NNjgRhQMWYSPULq64wCgzjJi UvMOclIwkuTiee8C2XHKdUw= =Ttqs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE8882CD74D12A86E38E8D07C-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list