From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Is6di-0006oK-OH for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:01:59 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lAE117NR012817; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:01:07 GMT Received: from smtp-3.tky.hut.fi (smtp03.tky.fi [82.130.63.73]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lAE0x9vT009054 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:59:09 GMT Received: from [82.130.46.196] ([82.130.46.196]) by smtp-3.tky.hut.fi (SMSSMTP 4.1.9.35) with SMTP id M2007111402590827403 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 02:59:08 +0200 Message-ID: <473A484F.5010401@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 02:58:55 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070812) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Place of EAPI variable in ebuild References: <4734D767.1080900@gentoo.org> <20071109220724.GK19739@gentoo.org> <47375195.9060400@gentoo.org> <1194985323.8302.14.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> In-Reply-To: <1194985323.8302.14.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: url=http://users.tkk.fi/~praty/public.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD9F53E723A5E1B06333CDEEA" X-Archives-Salt: c1e60789-9af0-4b99-8686-520cb199e281 X-Archives-Hash: 59e42ca9c44eeaf26c0e64d947f6a3a3 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD9F53E723A5E1B06333CDEEA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chris Gianelloni kirjoitti: > On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 21:01 +0200, Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: >> I plan to make the java eclasses use the EAPI 1 >=20 > Any chance we can *at least* wait until we have a release out the door > that has a portage version which supports these features *before* we > start trying to use them in the tree? Our general rule was to not use > features for 1+ years since it was added to a *stable* portage before w= e > started using them. Now, this isn't so much of an issue with individua= l > ebuilds, but you're talking about changing how the Java eclasses work, > essentially blocking *anyone* using an older portage (including everyon= e > installing from 2007.0 media) from using any package which inherits the= > eclass. I took this into consideration from the start. You misunderstood my plans. I don't plan to just stick it globally for all current Java ebuilds as there is nothing in EAPI=3D1 that would warrant that. You can see my plans in more detail in a later post in this thread. >=20 > Also, we should really think about this sort of thing before we start > using it. How are we going to support EAPI changes in eclasses?=20 As said in this thread you really can't set EAPI in an eclass. Regards, Petteri --------------enigD9F53E723A5E1B06333CDEEA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHOkhScxLzpIGCsLQRAjx3AJ9GzsdyCwZS0729wfEdbCUL7svCZACfast+ Wff4t4oTZiKVtGRkPuQtm5k= =tPht -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD9F53E723A5E1B06333CDEEA-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list