From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IpRIm-0008HJ-Nf for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 16:29:21 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lA6GSUVW008389; Tue, 6 Nov 2007 16:28:30 GMT Received: from nameserver1.mcve.com (nameserver1.mcve.com [216.155.111.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lA6GPGoH003488 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2007 16:25:17 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.55] (shop.monetra.com [216.155.111.10]) by nameserver1.mcve.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570571128E8E for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2007 11:25:15 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4730956A.6050500@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 11:25:14 -0500 From: Doug Klima User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070802) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles/updates: 4Q-2007 References: <20071106161512.GA21625@aerie.halcy0n.com> In-Reply-To: <20071106161512.GA21625@aerie.halcy0n.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 323f2536-1c81-4ab2-971d-c6ac084ec1e5 X-Archives-Hash: 106e1fe74542c0050ff7af3cf5b6f9bb Mark Loeser wrote: > "Hanno Boeck (hanno)" said: > >> hanno 07/11/06 01:01:35 >> >> Modified: 4Q-2007 >> Log: >> move beryl packages to their corresponding compiz fusion packages >> >> Revision Changes Path >> 1.10 profiles/updates/4Q-2007 >> >> file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/updates/4Q-2007?rev=1.10&view=markup >> plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/updates/4Q-2007?rev=1.10&content-type=text/plain >> diff : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/updates/4Q-2007?r1=1.9&r2=1.10 >> >> Index: 4Q-2007 >> =================================================================== >> RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/updates/4Q-2007,v >> retrieving revision 1.9 >> retrieving revision 1.10 >> diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10 >> --- 4Q-2007 3 Nov 2007 15:35:36 -0000 1.9 >> +++ 4Q-2007 6 Nov 2007 01:01:35 -0000 1.10 >> @@ -8,3 +8,10 @@ >> move x11-apps/compiz-settings x11-apps/ccsm >> move x11-plugins/compiz-extra x11-plugins/compiz-fusion-plugins-main >> slotmove =app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-java-1.4* 1.4.2 1.4 >> +move x11-wm/beryl x11-wm/compiz-fusion >> +move x11-wm/beryl-core x11-wm/compiz >> +move x11-plugins/beryl-plugins x11-plugins/compiz-fusion-plugins-main >> +move x11-plugins/beryl-dbus x11-plugins/compiz-fusion-plugins-extra >> +move x11-misc/beryl-settings-bindings x11-libs/compizconfig-python >> +move x11-misc/beryl-settings x11-libs/libcompizconfig >> +move x11-misc/beryl-manager x11-apps/ccsm >> > > Just to get a wider audience involved in this...this just seems wrong to > do. There is a QA bug open about it as well: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198248 > > What are other people's feelings on using package moves to forcibly > migrate people like this? It also sounds like this wasn't announced at > all and the packages just left the tree. > > Except the packages referenced are simply the same upstream project just renamed... so it is correct. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list