Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles/updates: 4Q-2007

[Doug Klima <cardoe@gentoo.org>]

Mark Loeser wrote:
> "Hanno Boeck (hanno)" <hanno@gentoo.org> said:
>   
>> hanno       07/11/06 01:01:35
>>
>>   Modified:             4Q-2007
>>   Log:
>>   move beryl packages to their corresponding compiz fusion packages
>>
>> Revision  Changes    Path
>> 1.10                 profiles/updates/4Q-2007
>>
>> file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/updates/4Q-2007?rev=1.10&view=markup
>> plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/updates/4Q-2007?rev=1.10&content-type=text/plain
>> diff : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/updates/4Q-2007?r1=1.9&r2=1.10
>>
>> Index: 4Q-2007
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/updates/4Q-2007,v
>> retrieving revision 1.9
>> retrieving revision 1.10
>> diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10
>> --- 4Q-2007	3 Nov 2007 15:35:36 -0000	1.9
>> +++ 4Q-2007	6 Nov 2007 01:01:35 -0000	1.10
>> @@ -8,3 +8,10 @@
>>  move x11-apps/compiz-settings x11-apps/ccsm
>>  move x11-plugins/compiz-extra x11-plugins/compiz-fusion-plugins-main
>>  slotmove =app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-java-1.4* 1.4.2 1.4
>> +move x11-wm/beryl x11-wm/compiz-fusion
>> +move x11-wm/beryl-core x11-wm/compiz
>> +move x11-plugins/beryl-plugins x11-plugins/compiz-fusion-plugins-main
>> +move x11-plugins/beryl-dbus x11-plugins/compiz-fusion-plugins-extra
>> +move x11-misc/beryl-settings-bindings x11-libs/compizconfig-python
>> +move x11-misc/beryl-settings x11-libs/libcompizconfig
>> +move x11-misc/beryl-manager x11-apps/ccsm
>>     
>
> Just to get a wider audience involved in this...this just seems wrong to
> do.  There is a QA bug open about it as well:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198248
>
> What are other people's feelings on using package moves to forcibly
> migrate people like this?  It also sounds like this wasn't announced at
> all and the packages just left the tree.
>
>   
Except the packages referenced are simply the same upstream project just
renamed... so it is correct.
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list