From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IoC9J-0008PR-Cm for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 06:06:25 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id lA365Z1s006683; Sat, 3 Nov 2007 06:05:35 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lA363gdI004301 for ; Sat, 3 Nov 2007 06:03:42 GMT Received: from [192.168.0.100] (ip72-220-190-134.sd.sd.cox.net [72.220.190.134]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D337864E81 for ; Sat, 3 Nov 2007 06:03:41 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <472C0F34.7020705@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:03:32 -0700 From: Josh Saddler User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071020) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] death to mailer-config/mailwrapper References: <20071103013550.GG22369@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> In-Reply-To: <20071103013550.GG22369@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig2E6210FBEB0EDEEECEB88662" X-Archives-Salt: ed977bcb-daa9-4440-9434-f36f161ed962 X-Archives-Hash: 6b044741757697d3f13eb30feb39eb46 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig2E6210FBEB0EDEEECEB88662 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Robin H. Johnson wrote: > A bit over two years ago, some developers set out to get debian's > concept of mailerwrapper ('alternatives' for mail). Ever since then, > there have been a number of package.masks for various MTAs, and > the need to carry them forward. >=20 > mailer-config/mailwrapper have not been touched for 2/1 years > respectively. If it's going to remain masked, can we just get rid of it= > entirely? >=20 > It was a good idea, but it just never took off, I think mainly because > it required too many changes to MTAs, and also did not provide for one > of the original goals - running two disparate MTAs on the same box. >=20 Aye, death to them! Well, I don't use 'em anyway. --------------enig2E6210FBEB0EDEEECEB88662 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHLA835aFMlhMsVyURAtQuAKDjQp333AIshg5SK73jZ9E5VvfGgQCdGu6n Oi6fJtKfBvHYjDFdqpsmLjo= =77Zu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig2E6210FBEB0EDEEECEB88662-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list