From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ImbTR-0000gY-CK for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:44:37 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l9TKhe83032624; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:43:40 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l9TKfZej030096 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:41:36 GMT Received: from [192.168.0.100] (ip72-220-190-134.sd.sd.cox.net [72.220.190.134]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8485964F53 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:41:35 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <47264578.5080100@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:41:28 -0700 From: Josh Saddler User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071020) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Slapd calls nss_ldap before opening its ports References: <20071022121229.GA24735@bart.bs.l> <200710290847.29220.vapier@gentoo.org> <20071029125738.GA2938@bart.bs.l> <200710291241.52086.vapier@gentoo.org> <20071029173920.GA7580@bart.bs.l> <1193685728.8365.0.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> In-Reply-To: <1193685728.8365.0.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigC1416049D63641264B3BC178" X-Archives-Salt: ee1edfa7-c32e-4092-a06a-e1f78fab29c6 X-Archives-Hash: 7bbd3f29ead4c8b1bc6f16df26eda41e This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC1416049D63641264B3BC178 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chris Gianelloni wrote: >> I may venture to assume that repetitive error messages of >> that plenty could be seen at least as a documentation bug. >=20 > Which should be filed as a bug report or sent to the gentoo-doc list. It's not a Gentoo documentation bug, so don't bother to file one, nor mention it on the gentoo-doc list. It's not our problem, either. If anything, file a bug with LDAP upstream or with RHEL's documentation; robbat2 mentioned their docs in an earlier message. --------------enigC1416049D63641264B3BC178 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHJkV75aFMlhMsVyURAglRAJ9Ld0AhO4CO8K1QU9ne06MYo7wgnACggVWC S5LIP6yt8HZ8+Cqu7to0ip4= =nYKM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC1416049D63641264B3BC178-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list