* [gentoo-dev] RFC: new project gentoo-extreme-security
@ 2007-10-21 23:42 Alexander Gabert
2007-10-22 4:04 ` Donnie Berkholz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Gabert @ 2007-10-21 23:42 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Hello,
this is a request for comments on a new project:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/extreme-security/
When the webservers have finished mirroring the xml file, you can view
the description and the goals of the preliminary version of the new
project page for the Gentoo Extreme Security Project. The new project
is about sharing a new vision and building a development platform for
new ideas and collecting input about making Gentoo Linux even more
attractive for professional server environments and increasing the
security and resilience factor of the distribution beyond the currently
possible achievements!
Thanks,
Alex
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new project gentoo-extreme-security
2007-10-21 23:42 [gentoo-dev] RFC: new project gentoo-extreme-security Alexander Gabert
@ 2007-10-22 4:04 ` Donnie Berkholz
2007-10-22 7:12 ` Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Donnie Berkholz @ 2007-10-22 4:04 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On 01:42 Mon 22 Oct , Alexander Gabert wrote:
> this is a request for comments on a new project:
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/extreme-security/
>
> When the webservers have finished mirroring the xml file, you can view the
> description and the goals of the preliminary version of the new project
> page for the Gentoo Extreme Security Project. The new project is about
> sharing a new vision and building a development platform for new ideas and
> collecting input about making Gentoo Linux even more attractive for
> professional server environments and increasing the security and resilience
> factor of the distribution beyond the currently possible achievements!
I'm curious whether this would be better-placed as a subproject of
either the security or hardened projects. Why do you think it would be
better off independent?
Thanks,
Donnie
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new project gentoo-extreme-security
2007-10-22 4:04 ` Donnie Berkholz
@ 2007-10-22 7:12 ` Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen
2007-10-23 6:14 ` Omer Cohen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen @ 2007-10-22 7:12 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev; +Cc: Donnie Berkholz
On Monday 22 October 2007 06:04:58 Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 01:42 Mon 22 Oct , Alexander Gabert wrote:
> > this is a request for comments on a new project:
> >
> > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/extreme-security/
This sounds interesting, though the project page is not very specific.
> I'm curious whether this would be better-placed as a subproject of
> either the security or hardened projects. Why do you think it would be
> better off independent?
The Security Team as it stands now is mostly reactive and not proactive so I
don't think it would fit very well as a sub project of security. Hardened is
another matter.
--
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (Jaervosz)
Gentoo Linux Security Team
http://security.gentoo.org
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new project gentoo-extreme-security
2007-10-22 7:12 ` Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen
@ 2007-10-23 6:14 ` Omer Cohen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Omer Cohen @ 2007-10-23 6:14 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On 10/22/07, Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen <jaervosz@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Monday 22 October 2007 06:04:58 Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > On 01:42 Mon 22 Oct , Alexander Gabert wrote:
> > > this is a request for comments on a new project:
> > >
> > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/extreme-security/
> This sounds interesting, though the project page is not very specific.
>
> > I'm curious whether this would be better-placed as a subproject of
> > either the security or hardened projects. Why do you think it would be
> > better off independent?
> The Security Team as it stands now is mostly reactive and not proactive so I
> don't think it would fit very well as a sub project of security. Hardened is
> another matter.
>
> --
> Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (Jaervosz)
> Gentoo Linux Security Team
> http://security.gentoo.org
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
I live the way you put 'friendly' first :)
regarding the past posts about the existing security team, I'm
thinking this project is suposed to build up some suite of
applications and configurations to let the administrator control his
security settings in a more easy way.
imo this does not clash with the security team's purpose; this project
will that the security team's results and make it into a more frieldy
suite
I'd be more than happy to assist in this project, or the main security team.
--
Thanks,
Omer Cohen
www.omerc.net
omerc.net@gmail.com
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-10-23 6:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-10-21 23:42 [gentoo-dev] RFC: new project gentoo-extreme-security Alexander Gabert
2007-10-22 4:04 ` Donnie Berkholz
2007-10-22 7:12 ` Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen
2007-10-23 6:14 ` Omer Cohen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox