From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IgI1g-0001Vg-3c for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 10:45:52 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l9CAZ5kQ012724; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 10:35:05 GMT Received: from castor.sshunet.nl (castor.sshunet.nl [145.97.192.41]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l9CAWxsH010143 for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 10:32:59 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by castor.sshunet.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A4E57C020 for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:32:59 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at castor.sshunet.nl Received: from castor.sshunet.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (castor.sshunet.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NOQEy0eQsNgk for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:32:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [145.97.223.181] (181pc223.sshunet.nl [145.97.223.181]) by castor.sshunet.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:32:59 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <470F4DF2.8020205@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:35:30 +0200 From: "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070802) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: lame use flag, local to global References: <470C40F0.8050501@gentoo.org> <1192002003.19716.2.camel@localhost> <470CD9B5.3000706@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 7ea677c4-81bf-48b3-b337-472c0d04906e X-Archives-Hash: fa48b1a5f61948f26edac8fe20510925 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Steve Long wrote: > Duncan wrote: > >> Steve Dibb posted 470CD9B5.3000706@gentoo.org, >> excerpted below, on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:55:01 -0600: >> >>> The reason we have mp3 and lame use flag is because there is more than >>> one mp3 encoder. In almost every case of the use flag being applied >>> above, there is already support for another mp3 codec (ffmpeg). So, >>> lame adds support for lame, not for mp3, which is also provided. >> In that case, shouldn't the description mention that? Something like: >> >> MP3 encoding support using LAME (as opposed to ffmpeg) >> > What about when the next one gets added-- would it need to say "as opposed > to ffmpeg or lame"? > > I agree where there's a choice, the ebuild should offer lame or ffmpeg or > w/e, and where not simply mp3 (along with the encode/decode being > orthogonal.) what about mp3=lame or mp3=ffmpeg? This will also be easily extendable when the next implementations comes along (mp3=newmp3lib). Marijn - -- Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project , #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHD03xp/VmCx0OL2wRAgIxAJ47l1Y0IdL3n/GGKPYoiYW2Ec/IAwCeIDxp mNGh5idhB7qUVEDQb3Y65sI= =dwdN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list