From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ifyv0-00072Z-2p for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:21:42 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l9BEA8N4002256; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:10:08 GMT Received: from nameserver1.mcve.com (nameserver1.mcve.com [216.155.111.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l9BE71Eh030342 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:07:01 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.55] (shop.monetra.com [216.155.111.10]) by nameserver1.mcve.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECEA11128E5E for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:06:59 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <470E2E03.7020300@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:06:59 -0400 From: Doug Goldstein User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070802) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New projects References: <20071001093003.BAA4164C9B@smtp.gentoo.org> <20071011112440.TA992f1.tv@veller.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 712e6bd1-b261-4a31-884b-98e7e79d2f34 X-Archives-Hash: 46255e0eb8bef8c1666cb53c0566037f Alec Warner wrote: > On 10/11/07, Torsten Veller wrote: > >> Last council decided: >> >> | Design phase for new projects: New projects need to post an RFC >> | containing information about their goals, the plan on how to >> | implement their goals and the necessary resources to -dev prior to >> | creating the project. >> | >> | This proposal was accepted with 6 members voting yes and one member >> | abstained from voting >> >> >> GLEP 39 was not updated and still says: >> >> | Any dev may create a new project just by creating a new page (or, more >> | realistically, directory and page) in gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en." >> >> >> >> This week two new subdirs were added to proj/en. >> (One was just added for an "existing" project.) >> >> Can the glepeditors update GLEP 39 to reflect the coucil decision? >> Maybe a new project should also be announced in -dev-announce (and GWN >> if they want to). >> >> > > I'll get to that now. > > -Alec > Shouldn't it really be a new GLEP that replaced the old GLEP 39? Since the way the GLEP system works, i.e. obsoleted by GLEP ## and we typically don't edit them once their out of draft status. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list