From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IchpS-0000pe-VL for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:30:27 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l92DJrCv012048; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:19:53 GMT Received: from smtp-out1.libero.it (smtp-out1.libero.it [212.52.84.41]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l92DGGv5006842 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:16:16 GMT Received: from localhost (172.31.0.54) by smtp-out1.libero.it (7.3.120) id 4688F31709D62DA3 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:16:16 +0200 Received: from smtp-out3.libero.it ([172.31.0.39]) by localhost (asav-out12.libero.it [192.168.32.40]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CrNjV9uqbH7Q for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:16:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from MailRelay10.libero.it (192.168.32.119) by smtp-out3.libero.it (7.3.120) id 4611FDB6123CA247 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:16:16 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAADPhAUeXOQmN/2dsb2JhbAAM Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.0.6]) ([151.57.9.141]) by outrelay-b10.libero.it with ESMTP; 02 Oct 2007 15:16:15 +0200 Message-ID: <4702449A.10402@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 15:16:10 +0200 From: Luca Barbato User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070607) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: sh versionator.eclass References: <200710012259.40589.uberlord@gentoo.org> <1191325130.6284.116.camel@uberlaptop.marples.name> <47023095.2090907@gentoo.org> <200710020838.58266.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200710020838.58266.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 8ccc501e-45b5-44a2-9fbb-90926dfcb95f X-Archives-Hash: 7e43755ba0fef29988f6fc5b699a65da Mike Frysinger wrote: > in the general case, dash will typically parse faster than bash. but is this > speed gain relevant ? if dash can parse an ebuild in 10% of the time that it > takes bash, but bash can do it in a 1 second, do we care ? the majority of > ebuilds are going to take magnitudes larger to get the job done > (running ./configure && make). You may want to parse an ebuild not just for building it ^^ still my point is that if the alternative isn't better isn't interesting =/ lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list