From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IGiQI-0006bk-DP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 21:41:34 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l72LeTJ9006732; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 21:40:29 GMT Received: from mailgw1.uni-kl.de (mailgw1.uni-kl.de [131.246.120.220]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l72LbDnU001894 for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 21:37:14 GMT Received: from [131.246.107.160] (alcatraz151.wohnheim.uni-kl.de [131.246.107.160]) by mailgw1.uni-kl.de (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l72Lb81J002582 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 23:37:08 +0200 Message-ID: <46B24F3B.5000505@jmhengen.net> Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 23:40:11 +0200 From: Jean-Marc Hengen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070730) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: default desktop profile References: <46B1A39C.2010406@schwier.cc> <46B1E88E.3030904@gentoo.org> <46B1F3C0.6060502@schwier.cc> In-Reply-To: <46B1F3C0.6060502@schwier.cc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: e3a2067a-4b4e-4a05-aa51-dd153d0cfe2d X-Archives-Hash: e043afcb3811eb9f3996a83569a9fc2b Martin Schwier wrote: > In the libnotify > case I would vote to make it a static dependency and not useflag > controllable or at least set the useflag by default. I see this so: If upstream thinks, this is an option, the ebuild should reflect this. If upstream thinks, this is vital, the ebuild should also reflect this. The decision, if some feature should always be included, when a package is compiled, should be made by upstream, not by gentoo. There may be cases, where it is wise to not follow this rule for various reason, but this should be made by the package maintainer per package and not be a general rule. This is what makes gentoo a distribution of choices. I don't like feature A, upstream doesn't it's vital and gentoo give me the ability to disable/enable the feature A via USE-flags. As a conclusion, even a lot of peoples likes libnotify, it is not a reason to make it a static dependency and not USE-flag controllable. There may be users, like me, who don't like libnotify. If this is seen as a major profit for most users, doesn't make a lot of problems, its USE-flag could be enabled by default. Myself, who would not prefer to have it enabled by default, can easily reverse that in make.conf. This is only an opinion from a user and reflects a part, on how I see gentoo and what it makes it for me the best distribution out there. Greetings, Jean-Marc Hengen -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list