From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IFDsd-0007az-4o for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2007 18:52:39 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6TIoxOA006872; Sun, 29 Jul 2007 18:50:59 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6TIladJ002007 for ; Sun, 29 Jul 2007 18:47:37 GMT Received: from [192.168.2.42] (ip68-12-46-112.ok.ok.cox.net [68.12.46.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E6A964A38 for ; Sun, 29 Jul 2007 18:47:35 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <46ACE070.1070804@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 13:46:08 -0500 From: Steev Klimaszewski User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070720) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: why? pciutils with zlib use-flag went stable on x86 References: <200707291936.57220.carlo@gentoo.org> <200707291945.22728.carlo@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id l6TIoxQ4006872 X-Archives-Salt: 729cf996-4734-44a1-9272-61de75eacbaa X-Archives-Hash: 33b1090f9fa4de9cde4d07e1d17ffe95 Sven K=F6hler wrote: >>>> Why did you provocate this breakage? >>> Which breakage? It didn't install a gzipped pci.ids here. >> That is with USE=3Dhal. Crap... >=20 > Oh! So USE=3D"hal" forces pciutils not to use zlib? >=20 > And so the check, which the hal ebuild performs, should be modified to > check for USE=3D"hal" rather than for USE=3D"!zlib" ? >=20 Except that ONLY that version that recently went stable has the useflag.=20 So the check will need to be modified (thanks carlo for that amazingly=20 useful bug report!) but will still need to make sure that its not built=20 with zlib for 2.2.6 until someone gets around to adding the hal useflag=20 there as well, apparently. --=20 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list