From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IDJD4-0004WH-Ae for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:09:50 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6OC82NU004186; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:08:02 GMT Received: from smtp-3.tky.hut.fi (smtp03.tky.fi [82.130.63.73]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6OC4hM2032038 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:04:44 GMT Received: from [82.130.46.196] ([82.130.46.196]) by smtp-3.tky.hut.fi (SMSSMTP 4.1.9.35) with SMTP id M2007072415044210682 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:04:42 +0300 Message-ID: <46A5EADA.1090805@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:04:42 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070620) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Forbid using versions in DESCRIPTION References: <46A5DE60.50708@gentoo.org> <20070724133625.065963b7@luna.home> <46A5E634.3030903@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <46A5E634.3030903@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 OpenPGP: url=http://users.tkk.fi/~praty/public.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9D42EE83422FE3AB9952DA2A" X-Archives-Salt: 19fdc474-27f2-4a4b-9b6f-5c99c1491023 X-Archives-Hash: f3cfbc553e9bdf208dcb8198f6f1951a This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9D42EE83422FE3AB9952DA2A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Marijn Schouten (hkBst) kirjoitti: > Christian Faulhammer wrote: >> Petteri R=C3=BDty : >=20 >>> I did see anything in devmanual taking a stance on this issue: >>> http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/variables/index.html >>> What do you think about adding a sentence or two saying that you >>> should not use version numbers in DESCRIPTION? This could even be >>> added to repoman. >> Is this iussue that grave, that we repoman needs to whine about it? >> What is the issue with it (apart from p.g.o, eix and friends not >> displaying correct information) exactly? >=20 >> V-Li >=20 > Perhaps we should just move DESCRIPTIONs to metadata. That would make i= t > impossible to use ${PV} and more importantly also remove some duplicati= on. >=20 > Marijn >=20 >=20 sounds like something for EAPI-1 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D186454 Regards, Petteri --------------enig9D42EE83422FE3AB9952DA2A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGperacxLzpIGCsLQRArrtAJ9nvFqk+B94h+EQqef7iJ2vFLK8xwCeMne9 pjh8trHO6cXq0hz3P0UjuFA= =o/y6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9D42EE83422FE3AB9952DA2A-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list