From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1IBXgX-0004Ca-TG for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:12:58 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6JBaKDc029445; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:36:20 GMT Received: from smtp-3.tky.hut.fi (smtp03.tky.fi [82.130.63.73]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6JBYS3V027121 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:34:29 GMT Received: from [82.130.46.229] ([82.130.46.229]) by smtp-3.tky.hut.fi (SMSSMTP 4.1.9.35) with SMTP id M2007071914342732703 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:34:27 +0300 Message-ID: <469F4C43.3070809@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:34:27 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070620) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] net-im/pidgin protocols References: <469F1C56.6070600@gentoo.org> <469F372A.9060107@gentoo.org> <469F3A9F.7030004@gentoo.org> <20070719122458.3f5425d4@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <20070719122458.3f5425d4@snowflake> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 OpenPGP: url=http://users.tkk.fi/~praty/public.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0FDD49F1D8BC3F563ACF9FCD" X-Archives-Salt: ade4ed93-1cba-4df4-92fa-5bcb3b67b991 X-Archives-Hash: fc1bd65a4f22acfd5e9c5b410be31efe This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0FDD49F1D8BC3F563ACF9FCD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti: > On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:19:11 +0200 > Jakub Moc wrote: >> As noted before, they are implemented, just not allowed in the tree. >> Plus, what vapier said, this info belongs to the ebuilds, not to >> profiles. >=20 > What, it belongs in multiple ebuild files, rather than a single profile= > file? >=20 Let's not get into this debate in this thread. There was a thread that was discussing this a while ago so all the argumentation about the general case belongs there. Regards, Petteri --------------enig0FDD49F1D8BC3F563ACF9FCD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGn0xDcxLzpIGCsLQRAjubAJ4wg4wDd66WVJuM3w/XRJLQozZE7QCeO7Iv Gxu4WMYGE3OIhhnoXw7e20k= =bkEj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0FDD49F1D8BC3F563ACF9FCD-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list