From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1IBTCk-0007d0-0c for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:25:54 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6JAOoqv013317; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:24:50 GMT Received: from smtp-3.tky.hut.fi (smtp03.tky.fi [82.130.63.73]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6JAMSgC010381 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:22:28 GMT Received: from [82.130.46.229] ([82.130.46.229]) by smtp-3.tky.hut.fi (SMSSMTP 4.1.9.35) with SMTP id M2007071913222730874 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:22:27 +0300 Message-ID: <469F3B63.9040008@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:22:27 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070620) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] net-im/pidgin protocols References: <469F1C56.6070600@gentoo.org> <469F372A.9060107@gentoo.org> <469F3A9F.7030004@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <469F3A9F.7030004@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 OpenPGP: url=http://users.tkk.fi/~praty/public.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0CEF9119306509695B4032B8" X-Archives-Salt: 71066a3b-d69a-49c2-b296-3df55b9f3b85 X-Archives-Hash: c95ebe3a4c8c3ab5f816d67e2ea41400 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0CEF9119306509695B4032B8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jakub Moc kirjoitti: > Petteri R=C3=A4ty napsal(a): >> Or just do it via package.use in profiles until IUSE defaults are >> implemented. >> >> Regards, >> Petteri >=20 > As noted before, they are implemented, just not allowed in the tree. > Plus, what vapier said, this info belongs to the ebuilds, not to profil= es. >=20 > Wrt pidgin - seriously, what's the big issue here? Users can't use > emerge -pv output and determine what they want, or? Will we bloat the > profiles everytime someone forgets to enable a flag and goes complain > upstream about a 'missing' feature? >=20 The policy is to have sane defaults for emerge . OK good that they are implemented. Let's say then until EAPI-1 is approved instea= d. Regards, Petteri --------------enig0CEF9119306509695B4032B8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGnztjcxLzpIGCsLQRApUTAKCGdcXoz9k12l1wxeGrt6EZIavdMQCfaL6L /qqo0tn/ubfydCGoLkjVtFQ= =LzId -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0CEF9119306509695B4032B8-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list