From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1IBT9i-000510-RN for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:22:47 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6JALhYj009573; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:21:43 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6JAJbvv007124 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:19:37 GMT Received: from [192.168.0.1] (253.199.broadband5.iol.cz [88.100.199.253]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E8AF657C4 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:19:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <469F3A9F.7030004@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:19:11 +0200 From: Jakub Moc User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070616) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] net-im/pidgin protocols References: <469F1C56.6070600@gentoo.org> <469F372A.9060107@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <469F372A.9060107@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 OpenPGP: id=CEBA3D9E; url=http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigA58FFEA9401ACDE4E3056843" X-Archives-Salt: 05cb26f5-10ca-4307-9cae-6302f8bb626d X-Archives-Hash: 61c4f5df2b0eacd743b92b172bd433c6 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigA58FFEA9401ACDE4E3056843 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Petteri R=E4ty napsal(a): > Or just do it via package.use in profiles until IUSE defaults are > implemented. >=20 > Regards, > Petteri As noted before, they are implemented, just not allowed in the tree. Plus, what vapier said, this info belongs to the ebuilds, not to profiles= =2E Wrt pidgin - seriously, what's the big issue here? Users can't use emerge -pv output and determine what they want, or? Will we bloat the profiles everytime someone forgets to enable a flag and goes complain upstream about a 'missing' feature? --=20 Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:jakub@gentoo.org GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3= D9E ... still no signature ;) --------------enigA58FFEA9401ACDE4E3056843 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGnzqzhxfV/c66PZ4RA/NBAJ0WfLKAihp6nOioW7Fc/6FsRkqa5wCgm695 QaQ3jy6uuq/oUXAC7x8ZJhQ= =Lnag -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigA58FFEA9401ACDE4E3056843-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list