From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1IAgtB-0000Ww-4c for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 06:50:29 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6H6nVwu008299; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 06:49:31 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6H6lLCf005817 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 06:47:22 GMT Received: from [192.168.0.1] (253.199.broadband5.iol.cz [88.100.199.253]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BFED647BE for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 06:47:20 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <469C65EB.6050905@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 08:47:07 +0200 From: Jakub Moc User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070616) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] alternative solution for 'procmail-impaired' folks References: <1184624995.7942.24.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <469C2E3F.1010506@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <469C2E3F.1010506@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 OpenPGP: id=CEBA3D9E; url=http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0219B218F25FFB5BCCA9F4BA" X-Archives-Salt: e2b268f4-89ad-43bb-81de-7db1ef8942ce X-Archives-Hash: 9d73560af4d0dfb624e4484548f602af This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0219B218F25FFB5BCCA9F4BA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Vlastimil Babka napsal(a): > Steve Long wrote: >> And no, I don't like being lumped in with Mr McCreesh. >=20 > Why would anyone do that? His trolling is sophisticated, but you're jus= t > an annoying spammer. Can we please stop this direction? My ZOMG was there to share my frustration from getting my mailbox flooded by stuff I'm totally not interested in and which has nothing to do with gentoo *development*. For less sucky ways of expressing similar feelings as mine, please refer to http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_131667.xml - sadly, the picture is gone now :( To bring this debate back on track - the current council proposal *fails* to address the real problem: people should not be required to be subscribed to gentoo-dev (moderated or non-moderated) and important announcements should be directed to a different (IMO read-only) list. Why don't we use current gentoo-announce list for seems to exist for this exact purpose? In that way, people who wish to participate in on-topic, off-topic or straight retarded debates would still have the choice to do so, while not forcing the majority of others to 'mark folder as read' every 6 hours. TIA. --=20 Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:jakub@gentoo.org GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3= D9E ... still no signature ;) --------------enig0219B218F25FFB5BCCA9F4BA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGnGXzhxfV/c66PZ4RA0THAJ9BGfwogK9vGc2At/6rfkUZS0te0ACeORJu +mx6X8tAmJWQdPgwvYkg/5k= =o9Om -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0219B218F25FFB5BCCA9F4BA-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list