From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1IAPRv-00075g-Rx for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:13:12 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6GCCGoZ022351; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:12:16 GMT Received: from slimak.dkm.cz (smtp.dkm.cz [62.24.64.34]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6GC9cPD018698 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:09:39 GMT Received: (qmail 46572 invoked by uid 0); 16 Jul 2007 12:09:37 -0000 Received: from r141.net.upc.cz (HELO ?192.168.1.1?) (62.24.83.141) by smtp.dkm.cz with SMTP; 16 Jul 2007 12:09:37 -0000 Message-ID: <469B6006.9040805@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:09:42 +0200 From: Vlastimil Babka User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070615) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes References: <46968E00.4070202@gentoo.org> <1184536747.18353.55.camel@sputnik886.lnet> <469B0DC2.2070903@gentoo.org> <469B5A4E.7090406@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <469B5A4E.7090406@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 OpenPGP: id=4E61DE84; url=subkeys.pgp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 350042c7-c75e-478b-82c7-85d6fb98e108 X-Archives-Hash: da2ee8f84cdc5313d551fdaed3221430 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Gaffney wrote: > Donnie Berkholz wrote: >> Matthias Langer wrote: >>> no offense, but this is one of the worst proposals i've ever read on >>> this list; why? because, one of gentoo's major problems is that it is >>> becoming more and more a toy exclusively for its own developers. >> >> Gentoo's always been exclusively for the developers. Nobody's paying us >> to do this. It just so happens that the things we want to do also >> benefit other people, and so they use them. > > That was my thought as well. We (the developers) owe nothing to the > community at large. We are volunteers, and if we want to treat Gentoo as > our own personal toy (which we currently aren't), then so be it. Are you people serious? Let's ban nondevs from bugzilla then? Close #gentoo, disband PR, etc? Not sure if we can keep any sponsors then... - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGm2AFtbrAj05h3oQRAnqlAJ4yiS73x/jAdaWJMv+Fh6fG33vaSACfdWJX GUCkyeDMTw0paODJ2bD86GU= =f7s+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list