From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-25040-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1I9WgG-00028g-Fi
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 01:44:20 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6E1hPtF010588;
Sat, 14 Jul 2007 01:43:25 GMT
Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.230])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6E1fZwZ008371
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 01:41:36 GMT
Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h30so1283776wxd
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type;
b=ep/pxwOKFJFQWdYUKdtlUTaNhURzlMYEP8FG+A76Op4rx6U8ZZw4K0twci6tYI0fUXVi6K9TvP+8g9d+REE43LkCT1wJBCFLBD/4IFpH7BpjjHXW+ZYyCRqC8JfTFt3n98kTnrMW6/6ydeb0F+Yxv7XaIqbB1xCGfh9ztc4J/Ok=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type;
b=JYQk09b7qfYRBsdFUYDlMQjJRFdLbgb/Mya1qkvogbMZQoqFT00owsduN/3HhgznATEnp0Du68ZKCgq3k6WPPLrhEEtFM3CwBeI4V8pXh2sVXEglbdaDtIr0G4acMnK52dQie/uc0sbEkKz+GUMxL3xDJuXVe6zThXFd9MOhvPc=
Received: by 10.70.37.12 with SMTP id k12mr3949949wxk.1184377295507;
Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?68.200.159.131? ( [68.200.159.131])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e27sm23491151elf.2007.07.13.18.41.34
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:41:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <469829B4.1000302@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 21:41:08 -0400
From: Ken <ken69267@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070616)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Smoother moderation scheme?
References: <46968E00.4070202@gentoo.org> <1184356016.6766.1200057851@webmail.messagingengine.com>
In-Reply-To: <1184356016.6766.1200057851@webmail.messagingengine.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="------------enigCAC79B96FBD6DDA4CAFA862B"
X-Archives-Salt: bef9e3a2-2629-4781-9ae2-1fac4285a381
X-Archives-Hash: 26cd713b1c834db564bf76065833d808
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigCAC79B96FBD6DDA4CAFA862B
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thomas Tuttle wrote:
> Questions? Comments?
>=20
> Thanks,
>=20
> Thomas Tuttle
How about no moderation at all? If you are going to go through the mess
of deciding what is a good post or spam, why not just go all the way and
set up a global blacklist.
The blacklist could be set up to say only last a week for first time
offenders, and maybe the second or third offenders can get a permanent
spot in the blacklist. Maybe only have someone globally blacklisted if 2
or more dev's agree that way one disgruntled dev can't just globally
killfile someone they don't agree with.
I just don't see why we should waste more dev's time with a moderation
job when they already are complaining of noise when they could be working=
=2E
I may just be a lowly Arch Tester, but I don't necessarily see why
individual dev's who are bothered by the noise can't just set up their
own killfiles and filters. It would be a lot less work than having to
moderate a bunch of postings everyday, assuming any of the devs ever
take the time to moderate any postings at all.
Just my 2 cents.
--=20
Kenneth Prugh - Ken69267
Gentoo AMD64 Arch Tester
--------------enigCAC79B96FBD6DDA4CAFA862B
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGmCnC0PM4px2/kjgRAgSYAKCMtNhQEnp0ii2T2mkgpqMvp7FtuQCfVJJI
GN56XWBC/QNkeB8PETvq4Rg=
=cIoe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enigCAC79B96FBD6DDA4CAFA862B--
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list