From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I9QaI-00032j-LB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:13:47 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6DJCnnD006946; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:12:49 GMT Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org (c-24-6-168-204.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.168.204]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6DJAtSp004727 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:10:55 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BD6B2480E2 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:58:55 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at twi-31o2.org Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gravity.twi-31o2.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qQznvnkpB3ad for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:58:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (draco.twi-31o2.org [192.168.0.12]) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B719A248079 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:58:11 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4697CE3F.9000308@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:10:55 -0700 From: Christina Fullam User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: RE: [gentoo-dev] ML changes X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 9d18547b-65fa-4075-90e8-84267bf5f6c3 X-Archives-Hash: 7414c92d343f916dc54ac009c8232db2 Darren kirby wrote: >And what exactly is the bloody point if all of the contributions from >users are going to rot in some queue until they are no longer relevant? I think everyone is overlooking the part included previously: "An additional method discussed was to have all non-dev emails on a timeout, pick a number of hours, and then the email if not moderated would be released. (non-dev sends his email, time period expires and no one booted it, so the email rolls through)" This means that non-dev emails will still be sent to the list, just at a delay. This same delay can and will be exercised against developers if the developer demonstrates a justification for it. This also means that non-dev input will be accepted and viewed as it always has, the only change is that there is a delay. Kind regards, Christina Fullam Gentoo Developer Relations Lead | GWN Author -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list