From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I98MI-0002iY-UE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 23:46:07 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6CNj9r2001059; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 23:45:09 GMT Received: from ms-smtp-02.texas.rr.com (ms-smtp-02.texas.rr.com [24.93.47.41]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6CNh8Dc031174 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 23:43:09 GMT Received: from [192.168.11.2] (cpe-24-167-13-115.houston.res.rr.com [24.167.13.115]) by ms-smtp-02.texas.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l6CNh51u027531 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:43:07 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4696BC88.80403@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:43:04 -0500 From: Jeffrey Gardner User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Macintosh/20070604) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes References: <46968E00.4070202@gentoo.org> <1184276637.26227.11.camel@localhost> <7c612fc60707121510o520cfbe7y4036aa2c83f7280b@mail.gmail.com> <1184280935.29731.11.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com> In-Reply-To: <1184280935.29731.11.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Archives-Salt: 5a939c24-3152-4e5a-894b-73d14137db9f X-Archives-Hash: 781a2b4dc39b22bf7a3d5b3f2d082c56 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 00:10 +0200, Denis Dupeyron wrote: >> On 7/12/07, Seemant Kulleen wrote: >>> My only comment for now is: why not just make -core read only, but >>> public, and leave -dev as it is? ... > > Understanding the simplification with the above approach. > >> Also I still think we need a private mailing list. > > +1 > > I personally agree there needs to be at least one private, non-public > ml. So with that, I would not be for opening up -core. Why not make -core o+r from this day forward and create gentoo-private for the secret stuff? This way we only need to be subscribed to two mailing lists: -core and - -private -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGlrpXiR2KxEpdjyMRAubGAKCwtLt+durjoyXf308VguXCTCvUIwCgyZIu QDEggzr0b8eSopi64bM0qqQ= =/B0M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list