From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I8JiL-0005MS-2Z for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:41:29 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6AHdsZ2015937; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:39:54 GMT Received: from smtp-3.tky.hut.fi (smtp03.tky.fi [82.130.63.73]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6AHbNGf012611 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:37:23 GMT Received: from [82.130.46.196] ([82.130.46.196]) by smtp-3.tky.hut.fi (SMSSMTP 4.1.9.35) with SMTP id M2007071020372228845 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:37:22 +0300 Message-ID: <4693C3CE.1070501@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:37:18 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070620) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] should we do an EAPI bump now with features that are already implemented? References: <4692B388.9030604@gentoo.org> <4692B68E.6040808@gentoo.org> <4693AD47.3060501@gentoo.org> <4693B8E7.9080602@gentoo.org> <20070710181452.3e0971a2@snowflake> <4693C163.2020204@gentoo.org> <20070710183204.074b4a98@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <20070710183204.074b4a98@snowflake> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 OpenPGP: url=http://users.tkk.fi/~praty/public.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB8C7AF3D595DFD47A26A7A60" X-Archives-Salt: 98fcdce0-9e4d-4bbb-a72f-ab0763905e40 X-Archives-Hash: ea15819e03dd87e86460004489f90eac This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB8C7AF3D595DFD47A26A7A60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti: > On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:26:59 +0300 > Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: >> Written maybe but it should be discussed on gentoo-dev too I would >> give a week or two at least. >=20 > Well, I believe the idea here was to get out the already-implemented, > already-agreed-upon, highly useful, low cost stuff as soon as possible.= > Hence slot deps... There's no technical reason for slot deps not to be > available right now. >=20 Agreed. Regards, Petteri --------------enigB8C7AF3D595DFD47A26A7A60 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGk8PPcxLzpIGCsLQRAtvPAJ48rpA5xosQ6DkGG547NmC4QLfXhwCeJOik MT53rhh5zaFVKje+IQpnbAQ= =nSaT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB8C7AF3D595DFD47A26A7A60-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list