public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] should we do an EAPI bump now with features that are already implemented?
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:01:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4693AD47.3060501@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4692B68E.6040808@gentoo.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Petteri Räty wrote:
> Zac Medico kirjoitti:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Bug 174380 [1] has a growing list of features that may be included in EAPI-1.
>> Some of the features are already implemented but can't be used in the portage
>> tree until we do an EAPI bump. The ones that are currently implemented include
>> slot deps [2] and iuse defaults [3]. Are these features important enough to
>> warrant an EAPI bump or should we wait for more features to materialize?
>>
> 
> I know Java would heavily use slot deps. What is the ETA for use based
> depends?

Hopefully within 2 months or so.  I'm planning to implement the infrastructure
that's necessary for it together with other stuff that will be needed for the
new dependency resolver.  The exact time that it will be ready is difficult to
estimate because it depends on how much time I have to spend on it and how
fruitful the time is, both of which vary a lot.

Zac
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGk61G/ejvha5XGaMRAop7AJ98ulIK/24Obs70t/40XWmIke4XpwCbBT1X
8gBX20/Bt9XHM9UWgyvQWp0=
=AfXK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-10 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-09 22:15 [gentoo-dev] [RFC] should we do an EAPI bump now with features that are already implemented? Zac Medico
2007-07-09 22:26 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2007-07-10  5:17   ` Mike Frysinger
2007-07-09 22:28 ` Petteri Räty
2007-07-10 16:01   ` Zac Medico [this message]
2007-07-10 16:50     ` Petteri Räty
2007-07-10 17:14       ` Ciaran McCreesh
2007-07-10 17:26         ` Petteri Räty
2007-07-10 17:32           ` Ciaran McCreesh
2007-07-10 17:37             ` Petteri Räty
2007-07-10  6:14 ` [gentoo-dev] " Stefan Schweizer
2007-07-10  8:08   ` Marius Mauch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4693AD47.3060501@gentoo.org \
    --to=zmedico@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox