From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I81pE-0002dV-1A for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 22:35:24 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l69MXlf0027257; Mon, 9 Jul 2007 22:33:47 GMT Received: from smtp-3.tky.hut.fi (smtp03.tky.fi [82.130.63.73]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l69MSe5V017799 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2007 22:28:40 GMT Received: from [82.130.46.229] ([82.130.46.229]) by smtp-3.tky.hut.fi (SMSSMTP 4.1.9.35) with SMTP id M2007071001283923448 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 01:28:39 +0300 Message-ID: <4692B68E.6040808@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 01:28:30 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070620) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] should we do an EAPI bump now with features that are already implemented? References: <4692B388.9030604@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4692B388.9030604@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 OpenPGP: url=http://users.tkk.fi/~praty/public.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigFB8453835886A625EAB44EDC" X-Archives-Salt: 20fc0bed-91f4-43a0-97c2-bc190bbeea16 X-Archives-Hash: 07131607ebeaeccc78b4945265bf495d This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigFB8453835886A625EAB44EDC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Zac Medico kirjoitti: > Hi everyone, >=20 > Bug 174380 [1] has a growing list of features that may be included in E= API-1. > Some of the features are already implemented but can't be used in the p= ortage > tree until we do an EAPI bump. The ones that are currently implemented = include > slot deps [2] and iuse defaults [3]. Are these features important enoug= h to > warrant an EAPI bump or should we wait for more features to materialize= ? >=20 I know Java would heavily use slot deps. What is the ETA for use based depends? Regards, Petteri --------------enigFB8453835886A625EAB44EDC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGkraScxLzpIGCsLQRAtW3AKCUXk+TLa6Gps5+zSjfS9MnARsxcgCeJ9Ba 7QG7l1Gkvi7T0Nf2HnglQ/I= =DD58 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigFB8453835886A625EAB44EDC-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list