From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I2duj-0002Yi-Sh for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 02:02:50 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l5P21sC5026204; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 02:01:54 GMT Received: from smtp141.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp141.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.141]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5P1xZQI021961 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 01:59:35 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-24-34-179-5.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.34.179.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ddrake@brontes3d.com) by relay4.r5.iad.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id C1A83C0E0 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 21:59:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <467F2141.9030900@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 21:58:25 -0400 From: Daniel Drake User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070618) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Unifying the behavior of the doc use flag and document it References: <467D2A04.6080504@gentoo.org> <20070623151917.35bd2b01@snowflake> <467D31EE.4030109@gentoo.org> <20070623155739.47099922@snowflake> <1182616036.26111.36.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1182616036.26111.36.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: f9fd0b78-9f35-4c30-ac0a-5993fe8ca143 X-Archives-Hash: ea9e61d877da13fe780601c5ce9b2a4e Mart Raudsepp wrote: > gtk+ documentation rebuilding can take as much as 30 to 60 minutes with > the doc USE flag for example. The benefit is cross references to glib, > pango and cairo documentation - upstream can not do that as they do not > know where the other docs will be found on disk. Though I should see if > they can not use relative paths somehow.. You might consider moving these docs to a separate package aimed at people developing using GTK+. gtk+ would then not install these documents at all. We did something similar with kernel docs (see sys-kernel/linux-docs) and there have been no complaints so far. Daniel -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list