From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I1USG-0002D0-Gb for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:44:41 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l5LLgJ2f011474; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:42:19 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5LLbntp003423 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:37:51 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.104] (adsl-76-203-122-178.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net [76.203.122.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A78164DC3 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:37:51 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <467AEFAD.8010904@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 14:37:49 -0700 From: Mike Doty User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070326) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-dev-announce list References: <20070621140907.1a2e4c2b@localhost> <467AEAC7.7000302@gentoo.org> <20070621153341.6b289085@sed-192.sedsystems.ca> In-Reply-To: <20070621153341.6b289085@sed-192.sedsystems.ca> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 OpenPGP: url=http://dev.gentoo.org/kingtaco/kingtaco.gpg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 556891ce-6d9d-481a-91c8-322a4abc70c1 X-Archives-Hash: 794dd77ee3e5453ad52e1f527375037d Jim Ramsay wrote: > Mike Doty wrote: >> or you could ask infra to work it's magic making any post to >> -dev-announce post to -dev as well and set the replt-to address for >> -dev-announce to -dev. that way it's all automagic. > > I hope you meant the List-Post header... unless we would like to have > another discussion on the merits/evils of reply-to munging :) > As an announce list, you're NEVER EVER supposed to reply to the list, so reply-to munging in this case is appropriate IMO. --taco -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list