From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I0IJh-0008Uf-Hq for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:34:54 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l5IEXtUJ023233; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:33:55 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5IEW6pR020990 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:32:07 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.104] (unknown [64.207.228.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56B0F65053 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:32:06 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <46769716.9050907@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 09:30:46 -0500 From: Steev Klimaszewski User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070615) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: QA issue: No stable skype in Tree References: <46701D06.5080302@gentoo.org> <20070617140632.GB7280@localhost.localdomain> <20070617201008.66b1340c@maya> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 090aa4d7-c177-4717-9fed-db8727c80ac4 X-Archives-Hash: 3616b6e99d0a4eff194cf4d434c94d91 Steve Long wrote: > Stephen Bennett wrote: >> Not everyone sees that as a reason not to use a potentially useful >> piece of software. We're not debian. > > Could you clarify whether this is indeed a Gentoo QA issue, or in fact a > licensing issue? If the latter case, this discussion should prob'y go to > the new -project ml if and when, or indeed the user forums. > > As for potentially useful, so was Internet Explorer, last time I looked at > what you could do with its Object Model. I still ain't voting to bring it > to Gentoo.. ;) > > It is neither a QA nor license issue, its an issue of the download being unavailable. Please read the full thread. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list