From: "John R. Graham" <n3440d@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-1 (or >1, perhaps) Proposal: AND Dependencies
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 20:27:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4671DCEF.7080009@gmail.com> (raw)
I occasionally run across a package version dependency issue that cannot
be elegantly solved by the current dependency syntax. Every time I've
come across this, it's boiled down to a range. For example, package
some-cat/foo has the following versions in the tree
some-cat/foo-4.0.0-r2
some-cat/foo-4.1
some-cat/foo-4.1.1
some-cat/foo-4.1.2-r2
some-cat/foo-4.2.1-r5
some-cat/foo-4.3
some-cat/foo-4.4
Now, package other-cat/bar has a runtime dependency on some-cat/foo but
it only works with the 4.1 and 4.2 slot. The other-cat/bar ebuild was
originally composed before the some-cat/foo-4.3 package came out, so the
ebuild developer coded the runtime dependency as
>=some-cat/foo-4.1
But, when some-cat/foo-4.3 came along, it got messy. The only possible
solution today that I know of is
( || =some-cat/foo-4.1* =some-cat/foo-4.2* )
and this potentially grows over time as new versions stabilize.
What I'd really like to be able to code is a range with an AND operator,
something like this
( && >=some-cat/foo-4.0 <some-cat/foo-4.3 )
So, my question is, does this make sense? Is something like this
planned for some EAPI>0? Would it be appropriate for me (a non-dev) to
file a bug and link it to SpanKy's "EAPI-1 tracker" bug?
Thanks in advance.
- John
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next reply other threads:[~2007-06-15 0:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-15 0:27 John R. Graham [this message]
2007-06-15 4:52 ` [gentoo-dev] EAPI-1 (or >1, perhaps) Proposal: AND Dependencies Vlastimil Babka
2007-06-15 18:18 ` John R. Graham
2007-06-15 6:28 ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-15 8:02 ` Tobias Klausmann
2007-06-15 9:33 ` Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
2007-06-15 9:54 ` Vlastimil Babka
2007-06-15 11:08 ` John R. Graham
[not found] ` <20070615120051.4f35ea2c@snowflake>
2007-06-15 11:45 ` Luca Barbato
2007-06-15 11:56 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2007-06-18 5:19 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steve Long
2007-06-18 6:47 ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-18 22:53 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steve Long
2007-06-19 6:38 ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-22 7:35 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steve Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4671DCEF.7080009@gmail.com \
--to=n3440d@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox