From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HyXcE-0002e2-8L for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:30:46 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l5DISjLO014120; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:28:45 GMT Received: from gw03.mail.saunalahti.fi (gw03.mail.saunalahti.fi [195.197.172.111]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5DIQfMQ011731 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:26:41 GMT Received: from [192.168.150.87] (a91-152-108-214.elisa-laajakaista.fi [91.152.108.214]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gw03.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A386216571 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:26:40 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <467036CE.8050202@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:26:22 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070409) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree References: <46701D06.5080302@gentoo.org> <46701E34.8090301@gentoo.org> <46702027.1010202@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <46702027.1010202@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 OpenPGP: url=http://users.tkk.fi/~praty/public.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigC1BD6DAA32AB2D501EE04AB5" X-Archives-Salt: af2ba058-2dba-42f2-a3fe-10af017ff799 X-Archives-Hash: 595a963d1b8e9701bc12abe0fae0110a This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC1BD6DAA32AB2D501EE04AB5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Steev Klimaszewski kirjoitti: > Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> Gustavo Felisberto wrote: >>> Any alternatives? >> Drop it from stable completely, possibly package.mask or move to >> overlay. Why should this closed-source rootkit be in stable? >> > Said the java dev.... >=20 >=20 We all use OpenJDK nowadays, don't we :) Regards, Petteri --------------enigC1BD6DAA32AB2D501EE04AB5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGcDbOcxLzpIGCsLQRAhZAAKCKVIfiJbUdZxJ3kJE2K4hmKrCVIACfa7Zv /woJO+hL9WFPEfoa+0JOkWg= =8Dot -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC1BD6DAA32AB2D501EE04AB5-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list