From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hy4Iq-0007Rs-SX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:12:49 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l5CBAR4X018689; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:10:27 GMT Received: from castor.warande.net (castor.sshunet.nl [145.97.192.41]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5CB7Tq7013998 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:07:29 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by castor.warande.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2689857C017 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:07:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from castor.warande.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (castor [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06761-02 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:07:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [145.97.222.195] (195pc222.sshunet.nl [145.97.222.195]) by castor.warande.net (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:07:29 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <466E7ED8.7020006@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:09:12 +0200 From: "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070419) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] guidline to set a timeline of removal of ebuild from stable tree References: <20070612100139.GA4738@ferdyx.org> <871C5811-7E89-43B9-A81D-F29BDC3CF31C@cilly.mine.nu> <20070612102118.GD4738@ferdyx.org> <466E7828.50904@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at sshunet.nl X-Archives-Salt: 716d40e7-3338-4ba9-a5ab-7152b8738ef5 X-Archives-Hash: a43dbeed906aded73e7a7b4e0e6a8f30 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 cilly wrote: > please, understand that I do not want to `blame` any developer, unless > it is discussed here with a final solution. Since I am not a gentoo-dev, > some of the devs `may not understand` my concerns and probably `feel > offended`. Hi Cecilia, Nobody will feel offended by your bug report. I'm asking you to go into specifics precisely because I want to better understand what the exact problem is. Or you could start using lilypond and tell me all that is wrong with it (a lot). When 2.10.26 comes out in probably a few days I'll be removing all other testing versions, except 2.11.26, because they have problems with the newest fontforge. I hope 2.10.26 will be good enough to be stabled. Marijn -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGbn7Yp/VmCx0OL2wRAjM2AJ0UdBKDsb+u0CVHvttKwAakqKvLgACfYer9 9J70SOJpZNkMNIkXe30OnRo= =9nCO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list