From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HwzqY-0002PR-6L for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2007 12:15:10 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l59CEBO9008776; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 12:14:11 GMT Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l59CBdqR005362 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 12:11:39 GMT Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so1249740uge for ; Sat, 09 Jun 2007 05:11:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=e5vbmU66N9XdOPO7nGmHyy+0neZgHHcKiLLQOuvalzfgQILcFNgrUVhMN/RDZE48kWxh7Z41SV7AtUXVsL0he2Yq1h0KwsT1Y3CnwTSvIv3RRLyg/S1EGHIAU2EP527AFPd4hu9gb6XNZSGeBe7ceZtLwpvr4zEaSgh+/aAwcJo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=dottoKmAx2iFUSNDr1h4XAKgpYV4tv0GlLkfjkUadOsjtEfPECn1TgKHhdDrh591Akd+8T5zQLu437WWlGNqHiFIIfXXCUP7tsRt9n2KmaYRbfptXGxs2cd4sPrqqCS6reYy7ncB3sjmjlJsVFZUrZ/hswMxuGU6nrzRzDbuwRk= Received: by 10.82.156.12 with SMTP id d12mr7030979bue.1181391099689; Sat, 09 Jun 2007 05:11:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.36? ( [84.66.77.146]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h7sm5330629nfh.2007.06.09.05.11.38 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 09 Jun 2007 05:11:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <466A98F8.3010405@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 13:11:36 +0100 From: George Prowse User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070604) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML References: <4667A38B.7070308@gentoo.org> <466A02B8.4040005@gentoo.org> <466A06AC.10809@gmail.com> <466A0783.4090001@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <466A0783.4090001@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a1f4f541-5622-41cb-acbc-93d08544a7e3 X-Archives-Hash: d19af0e730bf4b897627a94797897e56 Mike Doty wrote: > George Prowse wrote: >> Kumba wrote: >>> Kumba wrote: >>>> So I'm told debian has one of these types of MLs, probably where the >>>> flames burn bright enough to have earned a star designation from the >>>> IAU. Given what's been going on lately, and with calls from myself >>>> and others (i.e., mcummings) to get back on track and actually like, >>>> you know, develop something, I think it's high time we create this >>>> list ourselves. >>> [snip] >>>> Anyways, thoughts? >>> Bug #181368 is filed. Those seeking this reply-to non-munging will >>> probably want to post a note there and let infra decide on that matter. >>> >>> Lets try and make this work, k? >>> >>> >>> --Kumba >>> >> I say, just to be ironic, let the proctors decide and not infra :D > just to be ironic, infra makes the decision on new lists :Q > That would be the point of the irony... -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list