From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HwNtE-0008Ih-HL for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 19:43:24 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l57JgQgi004852; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 19:42:26 GMT Received: from alpha.total-knowledge.com (alpha.total-knowledge.com [205.217.158.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l57JeBka001921 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 19:40:12 GMT Received: (qmail 20677 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2007 12:39:53 -0700 Received: from unknown (HELO iluxalaptop.total-knowledge.com) (ilya@67.115.118.5) by alpha.total-knowledge.com with ESMTPA; 7 Jun 2007 12:39:53 -0700 Message-ID: <46685F11.1030004@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:40:01 -0700 From: "Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh" Organization: Total Knowledge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070521) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML References: <4667A38B.7070308@gentoo.org> <20070607132202.2a9eb9b5.genone@gentoo.org> <466830F9.10101@gentoo.org> <4668373A.9080403@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4668373A.9080403@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: aa440181-f2c2-4195-81b9-77999d58f3e5 X-Archives-Hash: 51da1cde0fc7ae82008b54437726daf6 Steev Klimaszewski wrote: > Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote: > > Marius Mauch wrote: > >> Do you really think people would voluntarily use it? That's an > honest question, maybe people are fair enough to do it, but I have > serious doubts about it. It's of no use if people have to be told to > move threads from -dev to that new list. > >> > > We might need some sort of enforcement for that particular purpose. > > While I think that "behavior" proctors are inappropriate, I think that > > people with ability to say "move this thread to gentoo-politics or > else.." > > for non-technical threads, as well as "stop failing to use logic in your > > technical discussion or else..." with power to temporarily ban people > > for non-compliance could be a useful thing. > > >> Marius > >> > >> > No can do - temporarily banning is a bad thing, its censorship, and we > can't have that, no sir. I'll presume this to be irony. Oh. Sorry, can't have that on this list today. Please ban yourself for 24hours. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list