From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HwMQU-0005Ec-Bg for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:09:40 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l57I853B029486; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 18:08:05 GMT Received: from nameserver1.mcve.com (nameserver1.mcve.com [216.155.111.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l57I4AiS023668 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 18:04:10 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.55] (shop.monetra.com [216.155.111.10]) by nameserver1.mcve.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BEA411100A8 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 14:04:09 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <46684898.6070805@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 14:04:08 -0400 From: Doug Goldstein User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070419) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PMS] Version Naming Clarification References: <46680E94.2080705@gentoo.org> <46683328.6010708@gentoo.org> <20070607194245.9b469b5d.genone@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20070607194245.9b469b5d.genone@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 7dade6b3-d29c-459b-ad05-01bff9c465f8 X-Archives-Hash: 507bc53a8af4207685d184ae7bc46b7d Marius Mauch wrote: > On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:32:40 -0400 > Daniel Drake wrote: > > >> Doug Goldstein wrote: >> >>> Currently in the tree we have sys-fs/ntfs3g. However the proper >>> upstream name and name referenced in every single doc in the world >>> is "ntfs-3g". I tried to rename the package however, Portage does >>> not let me since it is invalid naming. marienz and genone informed >>> me it's invalid with PMS as well. >>> >>> The version I was trying to add is ntfs-3g-1.516. Logically Portage >>> and PMS should only consider any data after the LAST - as the >>> version information. >>> >> Would this cause problems anywhere if we had the following? >> >> sys-fs/ntfs/ntfs-3g.ebuild >> and >> sys-fs/ntfs-3g/ntfs-3g-1.516.ebuild >> > > Thing is: if you see sys-fs/ntfs-3g, is that an atom or a CPV? You > don't know unless you actually check the tree. > > Marius > > I thought that was the whole point of =. That identifies CPV instead of an atom. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list