From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HwLZ7-00076Q-TO for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 17:14:30 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l57HCNpP020866; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 17:12:23 GMT Received: from smtp151.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp151.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.151]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l57H7ZmK012890 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 17:07:35 GMT Received: from [169.14.245.240] (host34.155.212.242.conversent.net [155.212.242.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ddrake@brontes3d.com) by relay5.relay.iad.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id AEC0660ACAD for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 12:33:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <46683328.6010708@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:32:40 -0400 From: Daniel Drake User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070419) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PMS] Version Naming Clarification References: <46680E94.2080705@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <46680E94.2080705@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: d3c6cf72-578a-48b6-b670-71931a385686 X-Archives-Hash: df70f93f4cb2a982e89535139d607a2b Doug Goldstein wrote: > Currently in the tree we have sys-fs/ntfs3g. However the proper upstream > name and name referenced in every single doc in the world is "ntfs-3g". > I tried to rename the package however, Portage does not let me since it > is invalid naming. marienz and genone informed me it's invalid with PMS > as well. > > The version I was trying to add is ntfs-3g-1.516. Logically Portage and > PMS should only consider any data after the LAST - as the version > information. Would this cause problems anywhere if we had the following? sys-fs/ntfs/ntfs-3g.ebuild and sys-fs/ntfs-3g/ntfs-3g-1.516.ebuild Daniel -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list