From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HwJ4n-0005BV-TJ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 14:35:02 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l57EXjtt008672; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 14:33:45 GMT Received: from nameserver1.mcve.com (nameserver1.mcve.com [216.155.111.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l57EVlhq006276 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 14:31:47 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.55] (shop.monetra.com [216.155.111.10]) by nameserver1.mcve.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA93D1110020 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 10:31:44 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <466816CF.1020909@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 10:31:43 -0400 From: Doug Goldstein User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070419) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PMS] Version Naming Clarification References: <46680E94.2080705@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <46680E94.2080705@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a81b69f3-9a0b-40f4-b2c3-a7273c54708a X-Archives-Hash: 34d1f0d494d3ad554edfd80982b09484 Doug Goldstein wrote: > Howdy all, > > I just bumped into something I feel is a Portage and PMS bug. Since I > believe in concrete use cases, I'll just go with that. > > Currently in the tree we have sys-fs/ntfs3g. However the proper upstream > name and name referenced in every single doc in the world is "ntfs-3g". > I tried to rename the package however, Portage does not let me since it > is invalid naming. marienz and genone informed me it's invalid with PMS > as well. > > The version I was trying to add is ntfs-3g-1.516. Logically Portage and > PMS should only consider any data after the LAST - as the version > information. Now in the cpv scheme of things, it's not undeterministic > because the following two entries would be the only valid entries: > > sys-fs/ntfs-3g > =sys-fs/ntfs-3g-1.516 > > Either way, that's my beef. > It seems my issue has been brought up in bug #174536 [1]. Sorry for the noise. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174536 -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list