From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HvyyT-0004Q1-Kt for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:07:10 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l56H4qSv032477; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 17:04:52 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l56H0LlM024351 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 17:00:22 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.104] (unknown [64.207.228.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A20A64CD4 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 17:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4666E7D1.5000609@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 11:58:57 -0500 From: Steev Klimaszewski User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070419) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Living in a bubble [gentoo-proctor] Warning^2 References: <1181074192.12669.16.camel@antares.hausnetz> <1181076263l.6873l.1l@spike> <20070605211348.GC1171@superlupo.rechner> <1181080828.17690.132.camel@workbox.quova.com> <20070606152947.GH26971@feynman.corp.halliburton.com> <20070606164229.2fe9e75c@snowflake> <4666E1D9.7050904@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4666E1D9.7050904@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 0fae5252-783e-404f-8511-c0fc2cd41302 X-Archives-Hash: 55179346edddc39dd43f3b7fb69bf316 Mike Doty wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 10:29:47 -0500 >> Grant Goodyear wrote: >>> (As an aside, I didn't realize that Roy's e-mail was supposed to >>> be a proctor directive.) >> He changed the subject and signed "on behalf of gentoo-proctors". >> >>> Is there a way to fix the current system, or should it be chucked >>> entirely, as has been suggested? >> The problem is not so much the system as a small number of the >> proctors. Perhaps it should be restaffed with people who aren't so used >> to wielding god-like powers on the forums, where anyone who dares say >> anything that disagrees with a small clique's collective views can >> be banned permanently with no accountability. > Back to reality, go take a long walk off a short pier. > ++ -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list