From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hvytk-0007eg-Cb for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:02:16 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l56H08Pn023581; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 17:00:08 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l56GuLT2016602 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 16:56:22 GMT Received: from [192.168.20.50] (dsl081-053-210.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.53.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7015364793 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 16:56:21 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4666E733.6080302@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 09:56:19 -0700 From: Mike Doty User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070426) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Living in a bubble [gentoo-proctor] Warning^2 References: <1181074192.12669.16.camel@antares.hausnetz> <1181076263l.6873l.1l@spike> <20070605211348.GC1171@superlupo.rechner> <1181080828.17690.132.camel@workbox.quova.com> <20070606152947.GH26971@feynman.corp.halliburton.com> <20070606164229.2fe9e75c@snowflake> <4666E1D9.7050904@gentoo.org> <20070606174853.0a0bdf88@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <20070606174853.0a0bdf88@snowflake> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a05aae15-4c9f-494c-a59c-aa802bb92df7 X-Archives-Hash: 651a30ebb52f002ffc1bc4697feb17fb Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 09:33:29 -0700 > Mike Doty wrote: >>> The problem is not so much the system as a small number of the >>> proctors. Perhaps it should be restaffed with people who aren't so >>> used to wielding god-like powers on the forums, where anyone who >>> dares say anything that disagrees with a small clique's collective >>> views can be banned permanently with no accountability. >>> >> Thanks for your wonderful insight, No one had any idea the proctors >> were a group with no accountability. When the council reviews >> everything they've done in the past month, we're just joking around. > > That wasn't what I said. What I said was that the forums staff have no > accountability, and that the proctors were suffering as a result of > containing too many of said forums staff. > > Perhaps you should take the time to read things properly before > attempting sarcasm... > Perhaps you should go take a long walk off a short pier. >> Back to reality, go take a long walk off a short pier. > > So now you're not content with filing hypocritical devrel bugs > complaining of people swearing in places you yourself regularly swear, > and are escalating the thread to ad hominem? (Note that it isn't ad > hominem if the claims are relevant to the matter at hand, so this > thread was previously ad hominem free.) > Oh, I'm so hurt. You think I'm a hypocrite. Man, what will I ever do? Newsflash, I know I'm a hypocrite, which is a lot better than the childish passive-aggressive asshole you are. -- ======================================================= Mike Doty kingtaco -at- gentoo.org Gentoo Council Gentoo Infrastructure Gentoo/AMD64 Strategic Lead GPG: E1A5 1C9C 93FE F430 C1D6 F2AF 806B A2E4 19F4 AE05 ======================================================= -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list