From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hvxmw-0005z9-3T for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 15:51:10 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l56Fnhlt008100; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 15:49:43 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l56Fk6Ee002758 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 15:46:07 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.104] (unknown [64.207.228.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD9064D78 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 15:46:05 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4666D671.90301@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 10:44:49 -0500 From: Steev Klimaszewski User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070419) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Living in a bubble [gentoo-proctor] Warning^2 References: <1181074192.12669.16.camel@antares.hausnetz> <1181076263l.6873l.1l@spike> <20070605211348.GC1171@superlupo.rechner> <1181080828.17690.132.camel@workbox.quova.com> <20070606152947.GH26971@feynman.corp.halliburton.com> <20070606164229.2fe9e75c@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <20070606164229.2fe9e75c@snowflake> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 8f6a8b08-1e51-45b7-85a1-2cc23c782f7f X-Archives-Hash: 9891e2769e965f648755a1a81001b3d5 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 10:29:47 -0500 > Grant Goodyear wrote: >> (As an aside, I didn't realize that Roy's e-mail was supposed to >> be a proctor directive.) > > He changed the subject and signed "on behalf of gentoo-proctors". > >> Is there a way to fix the current system, or should it be chucked >> entirely, as has been suggested? > > The problem is not so much the system as a small number of the > proctors. Perhaps it should be restaffed with people who aren't so used > to wielding god-like powers on the forums, where anyone who dares say > anything that disagrees with a small clique's collective views can > be banned permanently with no accountability. > Or... perhaps when asked not to respond to a thread for 24 hours, you could keep your fucking trap shut? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGZtZx1c+EtXTHkJcRAosHAJ42XbbNLSEaOVeLtAcEvTFMrmhAvQCggR5l NKfMVHNa0HuInct529dbI0s= =s4+3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list