Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Marking virtuals stable

[Michael Cummings <mcummings@gentoo.org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> So, only this reply.
> 
> May I conclude that nobody objects to the above?
> 
> Ulrich

Wearing only my perl team hat, it would seem to lowly me that if a
virtual points to packages foo and bar, and both foo and bar were tested
and marked stable by the arch's previously, that its silly to then wait
for them to mark the virtual stable as well, since at least in my
perception the only function of that virtual is to say use one of these
packages - which have already been marked stable.

/me hopes some arch brains step in, like weeve in particular, who is
usually far more eloquent at defending an arch's position

- --

- -----o()o----------------------------------------------
Michael Cummings   |    #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev    |    on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo/SPARC
Gentoo/AMD64
GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7  8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E
- -----o()o----------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGXpVDq1ztTp5/Ti4RAn3fAJ93fLU/G2QOB5p6jeGQst4lnyXEWgCfeuPg
kQDUKObUWKYcIWndm6zGm6U=
=beGq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list